Thread:TheHumanAmbassador/@comment-30937172-20181028162351/@comment-30937172-20181028181801

TheHumanAmbassador wrote: (..Not the contradiciton I was going for, but.. We'll see how this turns out. You did get it half-right, though. The fact that the war was won was a BIG part of it. ..I'll see where this takes us.)

* MOST of them can be convinced. Not all of them. And yes, we won the war. But if there was a monster going around absorbing SOULs at that time, we would have lost. Remember, no SOULs were absored during the war. That's why we won. We sent the monsters away, but we didn't kill them. The Barrier was the entire point of the war!

* Anyways. You think humans are just as dangerous as monsters? Tell me, what ability do HUMANS have that allow them to destroy the entire world?

Frisk:..So they're saying we only survived because there was no SOUL absorption.. Yep. There's definitely a contradiciton somewhere.

(It's practically right in front of you now. Remember, this is like Ace Attorney. Look through the evidence that's been presented.) Frisk has a big point. Let me ask you something:

You said that if a monster absorbs souls, humans would have lost right? Now then:

Have you ever wondered WHY no monster absorbed a single SOUL during the war?