Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-30518979-20190123034517

Now I understand most of you are somewhat dissatisfied with the recent turn of events with the FA, but I assure you, Edwards page, upon investigation was invalid from the start. Furthermore, even into voting it was invalid and only recently fixed.

The policy states, on 7.2.2:

Articles that are under no circumstances eligible for a Featured Article nomination are [...] Articles marked for inactivity or deletion.

The page in question, Sir Edward Recuivious Anderson-Henry Ragsdale III, has been and, during voting, marked for legitimate reasons, and thus falls under this clause. We will not exempt this page, as we haven't exempted pages before, and do not plan too in future.

Further attempts at an "uprising" will fall under trolling, any attacks at a user over this, as with other times, will fall under harassment.Both will be punished at a mod or admins discretion. 