Thread:TheSecondEdgeOfTheBlade/@comment-32730499-20170903022602/@comment-26821421-20170903034510

Look, I had planned to wait for Jaz to come on, and make a judgement herself. But, in reality, it would be better to just defend myself now here.

" eeey so something recently happened with her.

My good friend and I like to joke around and poke fun at stalking each other if we find each other on web sites."

One, please, I'm a male.

Two, it's not "stalking" if you happen to find someone on another site. It's a coincidence, at best. Stalking is a criminal offense in most cases, and as such, claiming it to be stalking, like both you, and IfPeridotRoleplayed did, falls under the wiki policy of " No  condoning illegal activities : Encouraging or admitting to any generally illegal activity such as thievery, piracy, or murder." As such, even if it's a joke, it's breaking wiki policy.

 " Well in Fred's defense shejp had no idea of this and of course she had no context but she deleted the thread deleted the thread claiming it was illegal and she would ban my friend."

 First, I hope you realize that, by saying that I had no idea of the joke, and had no context for the joke, thus putting me into the place of a reasonable staff member that saw the thread in a non-joking manner (as that WAS the way it was actually written), you are saying that I was completely justified in warning your friend, and that YOU were the one who took this too far, by continuing the discussion.

 Second, I didn't claim the thread was illegal. I claimed IfPeridotRoleplayed was encouraging/admitting to a illegal activity. Which she was, that activity being stalking. And, I only threatened to ban your friend if they continued their train of action.

 " Slightly reasonable but who deletes a thread so they couldn't say it was a joke or come to there own defense?"

 Again, you're admitting that I was reasonable in my actions, and you were the one who took it too far.

 I deleted the thread because, with the warning I had given at that point, it was a rule breaking thread. It didn't need to remain, so I deleted it. If someone really, REALLY needed to contact me about the thread, they could message me on my own wall, like you yourself did.

 And, again, saying "It was a joke" doesn't absolve you from having broken the rules. It's like assaulting someone, and then shouting "It was a prank" to try and prevent you from being arrested. Similarly, at that point, unless they had proof that the warning was unjustified (which you have already showed in this message that it was justified), they didn't need to try and defend themselves further, as in the end, they're taking it into arguing with staff.

 " Later I want on her wall and explained the situation, she then sassed saying there was no context and it was still illegal."

 I did not, in any way sass you at all. I gave you legitimate reasoning for IfPeridotRoleplayed's warning, and gave you a warning to refrain from continuing to argue about the subject, as there wasn't any more argumentation needed.

 As well, I did claim that there was no context, which meant I was justified in deleting the thread, and that IfPeridotRoleplayed was still breaking the rules by condoning illegal actions. And, firstly, you still, as you claimed earlier, agree with me saying there wasn't  an  y  context for the post. And, the contents of the post hadn't changed at all since deletion, meaning that it was still breaking the same rule as it did before deletion.

 " Along with all sorts of things, then she closed the thread claiming she would ban me if I took this any further."

 Firstly, the ONLY things I said on that thread was about the lack of context, the fact that it still broke the rules, and what I was going to do with the thread. There was no other "all sorts of things." And even if there were, you provided no examples, and you didn't provide evidence for this (nor this ENTIRE argument, really. If you're going to claim something is unjustified, please, please have evidence that it is.)

 And yes, I did close the thread, and I did claim that I would ban you if you took this any further. However, if you actually knew what I said directly, I said that I would close the thread, because no more deliberation was needed on this subject, and I would block you under the pretenses of arguing with staff members. Both of which were justified. The subject didn't need to go past the original thread, as whether or not the thread broke the rules was solid and confirmed. As such, no more arguments were needed for the situation. The drama didn't need to extend, and the problem could have been put to rest.

<p style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14px;"> " But I did not expect my first day in this community being threated along with my friend after I calmly explained the problem and joking about not jumping in head first and finding out what it is."

<p style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14px;"> You were not threatened. You were officially warned about breaking the rules, which you were doing completely. And the same goes for your friend, they weren't threatened, they were warned for breaking the rules. And, despite the fact that you claimed to "explain the problem," your explanation didn't change that it broke wiki policy of condoning illegal activities. And, again, something being a joke doesn't mean it isn't subject to wiki rules. Once again, just because you claim assaulting someone is a prank, doesn't make it less illegal.

<p style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14px;"> You say that I should've taken my time to figure out what was happening. However, from my point of view, there was only one option for what could have happened. As such, trying to figure out who was doing what would've been pointless, from my view, as there wasn't anything else that could be happening. And even still, me needing to "find out what it is" wouldn't have changed the fact that the main thread was still breaking the wiki policy of condoning illegal activity. And, I would also like to point out that you're completely contradicting your own arguments. Initially, you claimed I was justified in warning IfPeridotRoleplayed, and now you're trying to claim I was unjustified in doing so.

<p style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14px;">So, to basically sum up that large wall in a nutshell, not only are your arguments irrelevant to what really happened, but the biggest thing you said is that I was, in reality, justified in warning IfPeridotRoleplayed.

<p style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14px;">

<p style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14px;">Actual Evidence:

<p style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14px;"> Initial Thread

Follow up Thread