Thread:T42/@comment-10666155-20160124030515/@comment-8464494-20160124173449

I was given adminship because the community so liked the rules I suggested and promoted me on the spot. Like it or not man, the majority of people chose these rules and those who didn't like them were the minority. Also these rules are pretty much standard on most successful fanon/fanfiction wikis, I'm simply applying what I know is effective.

Also if you cant manage three paragraphs about an OC its not worth writing, these are supposed to be deep and engaging charactes, not just some four note splatsheet spelling out your somehow super special OC's magical powers without giving anyone an inkling of why anyone should even give a remote care about the OC in the first place. The level of writing here and creativeity is generally nill, these rules are going to culture an envionrnment where generally better OCs are made because people can not rely on as much lazy writing as they used to. If some people fail to improve and their OC gets deleted, oh well, thats on them for not caring enough about the OC.

Also "Strict Democracy?" So you'd rather anarchy? Where people can just crap out shitty Plants vs Zombies OCs and terrible four sentance sorcerer foxes? Its horrible and a monument to all things wrong with fanfiction.

Also these rules are not set in stone, and if I'm provided with good, solid reasons beyond "It may hurt some peoples fee fees" then I am more than willing to adjust them. But as it stands, the majority of the community approves of these rules and is all for the cull of these less than worthy articles if it has to happen that way. Which it doesn't anyway, as every page in violation has a full month (it WAS two months but the community asked that I shorten it) to bring their articles up to code, more than enough time for someone who actually cares.